Beyond the Average:
Why Distribution Fitting Matters
Fastballs, Repair Jobs, and Flood Insurance Claims
October 12, 2026 · Math Club · University of Dayton
Professor “Close Enough”
“Looks bell-shaped. Normal should be close enough.”
Similar shape. Similar probability?
Could “close enough” change our estimate of a rare event?
A closer look at the right tail
![]()
Beyond 3 SD: Normal ≈ 0.135% · Student t ≈ 0.586%
About 4× as likely under t.
A similar-looking curve can give a very different tail probability.
A distribution answers a question
A quantitative variable: a numerical quantity we measure or count.
A probability distribution: how probability is assigned to its possible values.
A distribution model describes shape, center, and spread, and helps us estimate probabilities and percentiles.
For repair labor hours…
What proportion of jobs require more than 8 hours?
What labor-hour threshold includes 90% of repair jobs?
Is 94 mph fast?
What are we measuring?
Four-seam fastball release speed, in miles per hour (mph).
Typically a pitcher’s fastest pitch.
Three MLB pitchers
- Andrew Abbott · Cincinnati Reds
- Tanner Bibee · Cleveland Guardians
- Yoshinobu Yamamoto · Los Angeles Dodgers
Why understand the distribution?
- Establish a pitcher’s usual velocity range.
- Identify unusually fast or slow pitches.
- Track changes over time.
- Support coaching and training decisions.
Does one distribution describe the whole season?
![]()
Pooling the season may hide changes over time.
Three candidate models for each pitcher
![]()
2026 regular-season four-seam fastballs. Normal, location-scale t, and two-parameter Weibull.
What does the comparison say?
| Abbott |
3200.29 |
3197.22 |
3244.30 |
| Bibee |
1877.28 |
1878.81 |
1943.72 |
| Yamamoto |
1970.04 |
1970.49 |
1995.87 |
Compare AIC within a pitcher. Lower means better relative fit after a parameter penalty.
Under our simplifying assumptions, AIC favors t for Abbott and Normal for Bibee and Yamamoto—but the Normal–t differences are small.
Lowest AIC among these candidates. Useful for our question?
A closer look at the quantiles
A personal baseline changes the answer
| Abbott |
1.65% |
| Bibee |
47.56% |
| Yamamoto |
97.62% |
An unusual pitch depends on the pitcher and the comparison period.
What did we assume?
- We treat each pitcher’s velocity distribution as stable over the season.
- We treat individual pitches as independent observations.
A good distributional fit does not establish independence or stability over time.
Cincinnati repair work
How much mechanic labor does a repair require?
What are these records?
- City of Cincinnati fleet maintenance and repair work orders.
- Our subset: 2,869 closed repair orders for police equipment, work-order year 2022.
What do we measure?
Recorded labor hours per repair order.
Why understand the distribution?
- Plan staffing and labor budgets.
- Estimate the proportion of labor-intensive jobs.
- Allow for unusually demanding repairs.
Typical work and total work
Median: 1.6 labor hours
Mean: 3.10 labor hours
A few large jobs increase total labor demand.
32 orders record zero labor. Positive-labor models use the remaining 2,837 orders.
Three models for positive labor
![]()
Models use all positive values. Display shows 0–20 hours, with the longer tail outside the view.
Lognormal fits best among these candidates
| Gamma |
12147.59 |
| Lognormal |
11526.07 |
| Weibull |
12166.14 |
Lower AIC means better relative fit. Lognormal tracks the long tail most closely.
Which model gets a large job right?
| Observed |
8.81% |
7.6 hours |
| Gamma |
7.19% |
7.0 hours |
| Lognormal |
6.98% |
6.6 hours |
| Weibull |
7.96% |
7.3 hours |
Positive-labor orders (n = 2,837).
Lognormal has the lowest AIC among these candidates; Weibull is closer to the observed values for these two questions.
Underestimating large jobs can reduce planned capacity. Acceptable error depends on the decision.
Flood claims after Hurricane Helene
Where do these data come from?
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) manages the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
Our sample
- 781 flood insurance claims associated with Hurricane Helene.
- North Carolina · 2024 losses · Single-family homes.
- Each policy has $250,000 in building coverage.
What do we measure?
Recorded building claim payments—not total flood damage.
Why model insurance claim payments?
An average payment does not tell us how often large claims occur.
- How likely is a claim payment to exceed $100,000?
- How often do payments reach the $250,000 coverage limit?
Underestimating large payments can lead to underestimating funding needs.
The policy helps shape the distribution
A mixed distribution for payments
A point mass at $0: 17.93%
A continuous interior between $0 and $250,000: 74.01%
A point mass at $250,000: 8.07%
One curve for the interior?
![]()
578 interior claims. Truncated Lognormal has lower AIC (ΔAIC ≈ 32.78).
Payment above $100,000: observed 27.4% · model 25.5%
Full model: point masses at $0 (17.93%) and $250,000 (8.07%), plus a truncated Lognormal interior (74.01%).
Professor “Close Enough” revisited
Close enough for a typical value?
Close enough for a tail probability?
Close enough for the decision you need to make?
You can make a presentation like this
This presentation uses Quarto.
A .qmd file combines Markdown, code, and presentation settings.
MTH 209 introduces the skills behind reproducible statistical documents.
All models are wrong, but some are useful
George Box
Useful for what?
Thank You!
- Please do not hesitate to contact me (Tessa Chen) at ychen4@udayton.edu for questions or further discussions.